December 14, 2004

  • It’s a work in progress…please give any first impressions about the direction of this essay


    GAP YEARS TO A BETTER DEMOCRACY


     


    I regard it as the foremost task of education to insure the survival of these qualities: an enterprising curiosity, an undefeatable spirit, tenacity in pursuit, readiness for sensible self denial, and above all, compassion.” –Kurt Hahn


     


                The role of higher education in developing students to be active citizens in a democracy, is not a new role.  What is new, is the growing movement to address the reality that institutions of higher education have not been addressing or fulfilling that role.  The lack of moral and civic education on college campuses has been readily documented.  The decrease of civic and political engagement, especially among youth, has been noted as well.  While the movement to address these crises has grown, the barriers to institutional change have continued to grow, and their acceleration challenges the values of a liberal education.  The task is further daunted by important topics left out of the mainstream conversation.  Largely missing, is a visual understanding of the student experience, and therefore, discussion about how to engage today’s students, not theoretical or historical students.  As we come to see many of today’s college student as anti-students, politically ignorant Americans, and personally lost high school graduates, we may allow ourselves to think outside the box, and discuss more creative solutions to developing college graduates who possess the values of a liberal education.


     


                To understand the crisis of higher education, we must first and foremost understand today’s students.  Many students, by the time they’re 17 years old and finished with high school, have been turned off to learning, and have not been turned on to the idea of the larger role they play as citizens in a democracy.  As long as the number one adjective used by students to describe school is, “boring,” we know this problem exists.  Students have become numb through a system of traditional education that demands rote memorization of facts and theories, promotes grading as a measure of success versus real learning, has sacrificed personal and civic development in favor of test-taking, teaches history that is often ethnocentric, inaccurate, and incomplete, and that has framed education as a means to a job, rather than as an end in itself.  It should come as no surprise that student apathy is often a major topic on just about any college campus.


     


    To be certain, not all college students experienced K-12 schooling as I’ve just described it.  Many high school graduates come across one or more teachers who shape their lives in positive ways.  Many have been developed into strong thinkers, motivated learners and active citizens.  For many of these students, a quality K-12 education, coupled with parental support and values leads to a successful college experience.  In addition, a growing number of students benefit from a campus culture intentionally designed to foster academic and civic engagement among its students, whether through the offering of service-learning, learning communities, strong advising, or specially designed freshman-year experiences. 


     


    While there are many successes to note of both K-12 and higher education, we still find that many college students are products of the type of K-12 education that I described earlier.  Students who go directly from high school into college, often go with fresh learning scars.  For many of these students, the dread of a high school education,  the cries of “boring,”  becomes the dread of college.  Others discover that their positive experiences from high school (small classes, learning communities, teachers who knew their names), are lacking on their college campus.  We find that many campuses lack intentionality in their campus culture, curriculum, and pedagogies to foster student engagement.  In order to fulfill the dream of providing an engaging education that develops moral and civically engaged college graduates, requires acknowledging and discussing the reality of those students who have been allowed to slip through the cracks.


     


    So, as a recent graduate, who myself was largely unengaged both academically and civically while at an “elite,” and expensive university, what do I suggest?  While I would love to see many fundamental changes in education, (doing away with the US News and World Report College Rankings, more schools giving students written evaluations instead of grades, more experiential learning to compliment academic learning, better and more personal advising, admitting students based on potential development rather than SAT scores), I believe one of the most effective ideas is the one that would require the least effort and change; We should encourage gap years for high school seniors. 


     


    As demonstrated in many foreign countries such as Australia, England, and South Africa, gap years can exist as a popular and powerful form of experiential and cultural education, personal growth, and social awareness.  Whether finding a job or traveling the globe, students are liberated to learn and experience life without the responsibilities and restrictions of traditional schooling.  Students can find powerful experiences from partaking on an Outward Bound course, to volunteering, to an infinite amount of cultural immersion opportunities.  In addition, students who attend college after taking a gap year are more likely to be mature and motivated in their studies.  Surely, this is a solution to developing civically and intellectually engaged students that can be achieved and intertwined with the principles of a liberal education.


     


    I recognize that this is a small and limited solution, however, with the support of educators, parents, schools, and students, we can turn an unmotivated student who lacks direction, into an inspired life-long learner, and an active citizen.  In the process, we can ensure students make the most of their years.  As we start to accept the many absurdities with which the average college student brings to college (stifling K-12 education, the circus of the SAT and college admissions, paying for a diploma and a college’s name more-so than the education provided, the many students who squander their time pursuing a degree with little interest in what they’re learning), we realize that innovative and inspiring solutions are needed.  


     

Comments (5)

  • First of all, I think school is intentionally boring. These kids are going to be bored when they graduate and become cubicle rats – no reason to get them too excited. If they learn too much, they might not do what they are supposed to do. I hold by Althusser’s claim that the education system is an ideological state apparatus that operates according to its own inner logic in order to reproduce the means of production, which, given the US’s hegemonic role in the global economy, is both consumptive and administrative. Cubicle rats.

    I also think that every who really excels at anything does so despite education. When someone is internally motivated to learn, they excel. I don’t believe in genius, for example. I know a kid who is “mentally handicapped” that can tell you ever statistic for every college basketball game for the past thirty years. Because that’s what he likes. Somebody said that before you can teach anybody anything, you have to give them the burning desire to know it. I think this is true. I read a lot, but I only read what I really want to know. I slept through highschool, and I’ve skipped more classes in college than I could ever count. What was I doing when I wasn’t in class? Reading. 

    By the way, you asked me about Libertarianism.

    My thoughts: Libertarianism goes by a lot of names. Some of its major proponents, such as monetarist economists Milton Freedman, Margret Thatcher, and Nobel Prize winner F. A. Hayak were big fans of the regime of Augusto Pinochet, the champion of the free market in South America. Never mind the torture (that is he is being tried for as we speak), never mind the CIA assassination of General Schneider and the following coup against democratically elected Marxist, Salvadore Allende carried out on Kissenger’s orders that put Pinochet in power. “I don’t see why we should let a country go communist just because of the irresponsibility of its citizens,” Kissenger said. And the Libertarians couldn’t have been more pleased by the “Miracle of Chile“. Pinochet’s regime was a shining example what  Other times the same economic policy (when applied in the context of the international division of labor) goes by the name of Neo-Liberalism, which is responsible for such policies as FTAA and NAFTA, which have drained, exploited, and impoverished the peripheral sphere of the capitalist mode of production in the name of “free trade.” Additionally, there is little difference (apart from the nonsensically abstract theory of aggregation) that seperates this from the classical political economy of Adam Smith and Ricardo. Marx accurately demonstrated the problems of liberal economics (in the classical sense, and neo-classical economics falls under these categories as well) in the contradictions that arise between means of production and relations of production that create overproduction, the international division of labor, the business cycle, the rate of falling profits, and subsequent crises that result.

  • Please ignore the typos. That’s all horribly written. I apologize.

  • The key is a variety of possible experiences, chosen by students as they need them. This extends all the way down the grades. The best elementary school I ever saw offered structured grade-level classrooms, and more open two grade rooms, and an open classroom style multi-age 1-5 room with 130 kids and five teachers. The best high school I’ve seen was based in projects (group and individual), independent studies, work in community environments, with classes for those who wanted them or needed them. The best colleges offer the same kinds of choices. All through this system we need evaluations (both self and faculty) instead of grades, authentic assessments – not tests, and a basic understanding of how humans learn. Look at two colleges to see the possibilities: College of the Atlantic (Mount Desert Island, Me) and St. John’s (Annapolis and Santa Fe).

  • Oh, btw… have you read Lies My Teacher Told Me? If not, you may want to check that out.

  • interesting start…keep it coming…

Post a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *