Topic: cookbook philosophy
I had an amazing conversation last night w/ one of my best friend’s from college, I mean, AMAZING. It was the type of conversation that only people our age and in lives very similar to ours would have, and that was the point. We both realized together what we had been realizing alone, the sensation of entering into a new stage of life.
My friend made a comment, “from 0 – 18, you’re always looking up, looking forward. Now, for the first time, we’re able to look back with some objectivity. To see just how 15 we were at 15, how 20 we were at 20, and when we’re older, we’ll look back and see just how 24/25 we are now.”
Our lives have paralleled each others a lot since we both met my junior year, my friend’s sophomore year. He had just transferred from GW and was on my floor. We both had similar breakdowns in college, my friend’s having to do with his love of music, and his decision to make that the focus of his studies.
After college, both my friend and I pursued untraditional interests, myself with outdoor education and writing, my friend moving to Boston to pursue his passion for music. We were both mildly successful, and also fell wildly short of our ultimate aims. We’ve both experienced highs and lows, and at times similar stomach illnesses that we have concluded were brought about from mental stress.
And last night, we both came to similar realizations about our lives, and our minds. We both decided that while it’s healthy to set goals, it’s not necessarily healthy to make those goals the center of all life. My friend said, “I’ve also been wanting to write a book about all my thoughts on life. But I only want to write it if I enjoy it. If it’s stressing me out, then I don’t care if I finish it, because that would defeat the point.” Which struck me particularly hard as I’ve been stressing somewhat about things I want to write.
There’s a cookbook quote we discussed, “Perfection gets in the way of good enough.” I’m not sure what I think about it still, since who wants to settle for good enough? But that is the point; To be more accepting of life. And at that moment, just when I felt like I needed to come up with a better quote, I laughed and said, “I guess that’s good enough.”
I’ve been reflecting also on teaching, as I am considering going into that profession. Despite writing A LOT about “what’s wrong w/ schooling” and “how to make schooling better,” having spoken with several people who are currently teachers, I’ve realized that the reality is that I am just as likely to be a kiddie cop as I am a teacher. And what will I teach? I will teach what I can about this part of the curriculum or this interesting fact or skill, but will likely spend most of my day dealing with kids running around, talking out loud, causing trouble, etc.
Shouldn’t my low expectations of what teaching and school is make me want to take back all my views on education? Maybe some of them. My views on schooling are changing as my situation is. I now see school as such a small part of a person’s life, and so is a teacher. You simply play your role the best you can. You forget about perfection, and aim for good enough.
I’m re-reading Fahrenheit 451, and the issue that this book is getting me to think about is the idea of “normal.” The book describes a world in which books are illegal, where firefighters are paid to burn down houses that contain these illegal books, and where thought and discussion at any level is looked at as mentally ill. I’ve resisted the instinct to say, “Wow…that’s scary how close this resembles the world today,” as it is just a caraciture of life. And still, I’ve resisted the isntinct to say, “What a sad world this is.” Sad because it’s far from perfect? It all seems somewhat relative, how we think of our cultures. In 100 or 200 years, clearly people will look back and criticize the year 2006, but from our present-day situation we’re basically stuck with what we have.
For example, say you’re in a rut in life. Hate your job, can’t find someone you love, bills are piling up. Someone can say that things are going to work out, and they may or may not, and ultimately, you may or may not have control over that. So, the best you can do is say, “right now is the best it is,” even though you know it’s not perfect. You’re left with the cookbook philosophy, I guess it’s just good enough.
But what of activists? What of a better world? What of injustice, of hate, of violence, of human rights? What of community, and family, and leisure, and mental health? What of, “this isn’t perfect, this isn’t even good enough?”
I guess my thoughts on that is that there are two worlds we live in. The WORLD, meaning the modern world we live in. Then there’s our private worlds. Our individual lives, family, and friends. Just like writing a book, one must be content with their individual world if they are to address the world at large. Think about John Kerry, and how it must be to know that he might have shaped the world a bit more in a positive way (key word being “might”), but now he’s a historical footnote. Still, his life can be good enough. Or take someone facing starvation in Africa. With their faith, even their lives can be good enough to them, although the WORLD knows that this is not good enough.






