Month: December 2004

  • Topic: HAPPY NEW YEAR’S


    First of all, today was supposed to be my last day of training at ESPN zone, but I ended up going right to serving my own tables.  The end result, several tables got their whole meals comped because I screwed up their entries in the computer, I spent 7 hours playing catch-up w/ entering orders, taking orders, filling drinks, and laughing at the ridiculousness of my incompetance, but, the reward was $110.  In fact…one table left me $20, probably because their meal was on the house, because i screwed up.  So…the worse I do, the more I make :)


    It’s 7pm and I still have no New Year’s plans and I really don’t feel the pressure.  I don’t want to blow my bank, and I’m right at the Baltimore harbor and will probably watch the fireworks w/ an estimated 100,000+ they say.


    Anyways…happy new year’s to all!!!


    Cheers,
    -dan

  • topic: help me solve this inherent contradiction


    I’m a school critic.  I think schools are inherently bad to both the development of compassoinate people, as well as to the development of life-long learners, informed thinkers, etc. etc.  People do learn in schools, however, most modern schools, in my opinion, are not built in the most efficient way to provide those things that we intend.  For example, the push to get more and more students to go to college is also tied with the fact that college for most of those who are going is merely an economic tool to get access to certain jobs.  I would argue that in most cases, colleges fail to develop truly “educated citizens,” as they’re supposed to do.


    So…there’s the inherent contradiction.  Schools are good in the sense that we need the degrees they give in order to have financial success in life.  Since that is the case, I believe that we need to help the poor gain access to schools in order to have access to those financial tools.  At the same time, in many cases we are providing funding to put people into schools that are simply not in a position to develop students in a healthy way both personally and intellectually.


    But…here’s another twist.  So long as tax money goes towards education in its various forms, the people and the gov’t, will want to know, “how well is this money being spent.”  These has lead to the accountability movement, which views schools as a business investment.  Instead of profits, we look at test scores, which inherently leads to inadequate education because test scores have a negative effect on learning and passion to learn.


    I met a libertarian when I was bussing the country this fall.  A very knowledgable and pleasant person.  His view of politics, “anything big that is run by gov’t is bound to fail.”  I thought about that over and over, and thinking about education, I see how it’s true.  Government schools, so long as they are required to teach as they have for 100 years, are bound to fail to provide the best education possible. 


    The best schools, are those that don’t test.  thatliberalmedia despite my initial misunderstandings, (which is natural in xangaland when people you’ve never met come in an throw a wrench in your thinking, or make statements that bring with them many beliefs about that person) made me think further about the role of government.  The thing is, funding for schools is a double-edged sword, public schools are both necessary to ensure the poorest are able to go to school (which is good for them job-wise), while simultaneously providing those people with an education that is inherently substandard (because, by it’s nature, public schooling needs to be held accountable through testing). 


    Topic: politics in general


    Ugh…what’s the lesson of 2004.  The first lesson was how divided we are.  But, the bigger lesson was how little we understand the other side.  I’ve recently found my niche as a social democrat, but I think inherent in just about any political ideal are flaws.  Honestly…I think we’re fucked anyway you look at it.  Someone posted a comment on dara’s site, that we’re idealists when we’re young because we don’t have to worry about making money or paying the bills.  Then reality kicks in.  The reality is, in 50, 100, 200, years, we’re still going to be having these conversations.  Was there was 1000 years ago.  Yup.  Poverty.  Yup.  Inequality.  Yup.  Is there less war, poverty, inequality, than there was 1000 years ago.  I don’t think so.  Despite our incredible technological advances, is there any reason to believe that in 1000 years we still won’t be facing the problems of poverty, war, and inequality?  Nope.


    I once read this book by Edward de Bono, the guy who coined the term, “lateral thinking.”  As long as our fundamental views of the world remain the same, nothing will change.  It’s the radical, out-of-the box ideas that change things, and no culture has ever been built on continuously viewing things radically.  A lateral thinking culture would say, “we want to educate the poor, but we want schools w/out tests and grades, what can we do?” 


    The comment about being an idealist really hits hard, not just becaue my time is now consumed with worrying about making a dollar, but, because I realize how every generation thinks this is the one that will bring about a utopian society.  And, part of the reason we believe that is our simplistic view of the world.  I want to throw a wrench in the minds of every child and say, “by the way, over 100,000 people just died from a tsunami.  Now there’s millions living in grief, and in conditions that will probably kill many more.  So…when you start thinking about how you can improve the world, don’t forget that there’s one more problem in the world to deal with.”


    My old supervisor said one of the most complimenting things to me yesturday, before taking it back.  He said, “I was thinking about what you said, [about being a famous 23-year old school critic] and I thought, maybe you are the one.  Maybe you don’t need to be an old professor to criticize school.  The internet was a 1 in a million thing, started by a young person…but, not to take anything away from you, I don’t think you’re that person.”  OUCH…I thought, but he’s right.  I believe deep I won’t be the 1 in a million to revolutionize education, however, tell a young athlete they’ll never win a gold medal. 


    I was watching swimming the other day…to spend your whole life trying to be the best swimmer.  It’s simultaneously silly, to make a life out of swimming and to probably never meet your goal, as well as inspiring and wonderful, to do something you love and to strive for something seemingly unattainable.  I guess that’s my take on life, you get one shot, why not try something ridiculous with it, something fun and adventurous. 


    Life has become this double world of external and internal reality.  Neither THE world, nor MY world, makes very much sense.  Reading about history and politics has helped me grapple a bit w/ the external world, perhaps some advice on literature pertaining to the internal world. (i think learning more about buddhism/taoism will ground my thoughts in something bigger).

  • topic: out with the old, in with the new


    I went in to DC today to end my internship at the American Association of State Colleges and Universities, with the American Democracy Project, and ended up beginning a new internship with the same organization (AASCU), but working in a different department, government relations and policy analysis.  I’m keeping my emotions in a state of tao, I was prepared to come in today, say thanks, and that was that, and now I will give it another go, another 30-day test-drive, with the same attitutde that this could be fun or not fun, but, I’ll take from it whatever I can.


    I am a bit more optimistic.  The department I work with works with more tangible things than I was doing before.  For example, they lobby on Capital Hill for things such as financial aid and Pell Grants, and I must say, hearing the words Capital Hill has a sexy ring to it, and despite the fact I’ve never been inclined to do anything political in my life, my growing interest in many things politics should make this a good experience.  I’ve just been given a bunch of things to read through regarding state issues.  The dept. does a monthly briefing called “policy matters,” and this month will be highlighting the major issues that will face state legislatures, both issues that directly effect higher ed., and those that indirectly effect higher ed., such as Medicaid, which is taking a larger and larger chunk of state funds.  The backdrop of this briefing (and I must say I got a lot of info in about 20min.), is that while the economy has recovered a bit, there’s more hands and tin cups out there looking for some of those revenues.  What I initially like about this new project is the clear interweaving of subjects, politics, economics, and education.  It’s going to force me to learn about things I previously wasn’t very interested in, and should hopefully build more of a foundation to my understanding of how things work (it’s funny, in college there’s a physics class we call baby physics, titled how things work.  But I still probably couldn’t tell you how a lightbulb works).


    In other news, today is day #3 of training at ESPN Zone.  Being a waiter is a highly engaging fast-paced job, which I do enjoy.  The prospect of making good tips is also promising.  But man-o-man, do my feet hurt…hopefully the shoes will be broken in soon enough.  Much respect to those who grind it out in those grind-it-out type jobs everyday. 

  • topic: quick thoughts


    1) the guy on CNN has a wicked English accent


    2) How ridiculous is this tsunami…i still can’t fathom this being real.  For the countried of India, Thailand, Malaysia, and all the areas most affected, the 23,000 dead, the thousands more missing, the loss felt, the destruction, this will be their 9/11.  Life there will be looked at as, life after 12/27/04, their world will never be the same, and yet, I sense that in a week, we as a country will naturally return to US issues, and that disturbs me.  Thailand was definately a country on my “must visit” list, and for at least a generation I would think, life there will be drastically different.


    3) I began work at ESPN zone, got back at 1am, need to be up to work in the morning, not used to these quick turn-arounds.  Job is ok, got to watch quite a bit of tv, learned a lot of what needed to be learned.  Essentially…I’m trying to put a positive spin on the upcoming 2 months.  This job is certainly one in which I will feel alienated from my labor.  I hate the idea of restaurants in general, although I frequent them.  There is so much food wasted, so much money wasted ($10 for a burger I could make for half and $5 beers that I could buy 6 of), plus, it’s my job to encourage people to spend more, even if they don’t need to spend more, and even if they don’t need to eat or drink more.  Anyways…I obviously don’t think restaurants are all that bad, I don’t oppose them, and I don’t think me working or not working at one makes a difference.  It just flies in the face of what I really value.


    However, to spin it positively, it is humbling.  It is humbling to do work that is not meaningful to me, but, is a means to money.  It is humbling to do work with others who are not like me, who NEED this job for money, who cannot find work that is personally meaningful.  It is humbling to me to know that for some people, this work is personally meaningful.  It is humbling to me to know that my view of life is my view based on my life experiences and background, and humbling to know that others view life differently for perfeclty legitimate reasons. 


    My thoughts on this are not well thought out…but they’re thoughts that are there.  I am privilaged to not have ever had to work to support myself for the most part.  However, because of that priviliage, I feel that I have both the privilage, the ability, and mostly the responsibility to do something positive with it.  Bringing people food is not part of the plan, I think, however, it’s a means to and end, whatever that end is.  Ugh…I hate thinking, and overthinking everything, it’s really a curse, i’m going to bed.

  • Been playing around on Wiki some more…if  I was a college student, I’d be applauded for being so studious, for wanting to learn so much, for questioning and challenging myself.  Funny how since I’m not a student, and I’ve “graduated from learning,” as it often feels, pursuing independant learning is looked at by many as an oddity.  Just another strange observation of our culture.


    Anyways…I’ve been bouncing around several topics.  Here’s what I’ve learned.


    Politically…I’d describe myself as a social democrat.  I’ve grown up w/ capitalism, and I think it has a lot of problems.  That pretty much fits in with the philosophy of social democrats.  How can we have a more humane form of capitalism?  That’s what it’s all about.


    Whose political views are fairly representative of being an SD?  Michael Moore’s name came up, someone I’ve grown to respect.  While acknowledging the various criticisms of Moore, (just trying to get rich, un-patriotic, a liar), I feel comfortable saying he is true to the SD philosophy of pointing out the ills of capitalism and working to improve.  His story is interesting too.  He won a seat on his school board as a high school senion on a platform to fire the principal and vice-principal, and they eventually did resign.  Moore was fired as editor of the magazine Mother Jones because he criticized an article that he viewed to be too critical of the Sandistas in Nicragua.  He filed a lawsuit for wrongful dismissal, won $58,000, and went on to use that money to produce his first documentary, Roger & Me.  He also worked for one of the most famous public advocated, Ralph Nader.


    On the Socialist Democrats USA website, there’s an essay on public education by Sandra Feldman, the president of the United Federation of Teachers (at least back in ’99 when this was written) I found these two paragraphs very helpful in understanding how an SD philosophy plays out today in education:


    “I am not against the market economy. (There was a time in my childhood when I was, but now I am not.) The market economy certainly has been good for America. But the market economy is not good for all its citizens. It does not work for everybody. In poor neighborhoods, for example, you don’t find these huge, beautiful, shining supermarkets that you find in the suburbs. Instead, you find some 7-11 or some dirty grocery stores. The market economy has not provided this choice for poor people. I don’t know why — I’m not an economist. But I notice that poor people, especially poor children, don’t get the kind of health care that wealthier people get; they just don’t get it. The market economy has not provided this.


    So we have to decide what we want government to take responsibility for. Government should not take responsibility for making sure that companies make a lot of money, or for regulating the whole global economy. But there are certain things that government must take responsibility for, and public education is one of them. If you want to educate all of your country’s children, rich and poor, then government must assume the responsibility. The market will not do this. The Road Ahead – the union must change.”


    http://www.socialdemocrats.org/NewApproachesinEducation.html 


    A quality education for all cannot be guaranteed through a private system of education.  However, can a public system succeed in educating its students.  Just as corporate media will have a bias towards a free-market, doesn’t government run schooling ensure a pro-government Patriotic bias in our schools?


    Ironically for those who support privatization because of the US’s lagging behind other nations in test scores, the “best,” educational systems are found in those countries that have a form of socialized education. Among the top 4,  Cuba, Canada, Finland and Korea. 


    The following article I found on indymedia, and they found it in Workers World.
    http://www.stlimc.org/front.php3?article_id=17896&group=webcast


    Here’s a part I want to show you:


    “Cuba, a relatively underdeveloped coun try of 11.2 million people, spends 10 to 11 percent of its GDP on education, by far the highest ratio of any country in the world. Finland, the next closest, spends 6 percent.

    Cuba’s educational system is mandatory through the ninth grade, free to all at all levels including higher education and “promotes the whole individual (including physical education, sports, recreation and artistic education) while explicitly linking education with life, work and production.” This is done through what Cubans call emulation, a form of competition where the group works together to win as a collective.

    The study calls Cuba’s educational feats “impressive.” Less than 10 years after the revolution, it had reduced illiteracy by 40 percent, achieving a 96.9 percent literacy rate. Its pupils-to-teacher ratio is now 13.5 in primary school and 15 for all levels of education.”


    So…for those who support the free-market for education, the evidence shows that we’d be better off digging deep and trying to build our public schools, following the lead of our favorite countries, like Cuba and Canada.

  • Topic: media…and the Dan Revolution


    http://www.laweekly.com/ink/05/05/the-ireland.php - 4 Ways to Find Out What’s Really Happening in Iraq, from the la times


    The Dan Revolution:


    Phase 1 – recognize that most of what I’ve been taught has been either wrong or incomplete


    Phase 2 – search out some form of truth


    Phase 3 – recognize that previous forms of truth, the media, school, are structured to either distort or omit the truth


    Phase 4 – uncover new forms of media and learning


    http://www.mediachannel.org/


    http://indymedia.us/en/index.shtml


    Also, has anyone seen the movie, “Weopons of Mass Deception?”  I know it’s only out in a few cities…

  • Topic: Which is better, benevolant individuals or a benevolant state?


    so…i was watching some football pre-game, and there was a special on Warrick Dunn, who plays for the Atl. falcons.  Like all pro-athletes, he has more money than he knows what to do, but he’s started a foundation that helps poor people put down-payments on their houses, and fills the houses with food, furniture, and a computer.  We can clearly see there, how extreme wealth leads to clear benefits for the less fortunate.  I want to question now Huey Long, a politician who took money from the rich, from people like Dunn, so the gov’t can try to help the poor.  The question is, who is more capable of helping the poor, rich individuals, or a rich gov’t?  Think about schools, as much as I support the idea of public schooling, the reality is as we know, that public schooling often does more harm than good to students’ learning and love of learning.  Even if we taxed more and put more money into schools, we’d still find the same problems, test scores might go up, but real learning would down.  What are the best schools that use the best educational practices?  Typically privately funded schools, schools funded through the wealth of people like Bill Gates.  So, despite the outrage of the middle-class and below about the superwealth of a few, we cannot deny the many contributions in the forms of foundations and other programs established out of the benevolance of the rich, and while it is true that there exists enough wealth from the rich that could help the poor, how does private expenditure of wealth compare to gov’t expenditure of wealth (welfare, public schools). 


    Let’s assume for a minute, that everyone, capitalists, socialists, Democrats, Republicans, Green Party, etc., all want the same thing.  They want a society where everyone has enough to live comfortably.  If we could all start from that premise, we might be able to better understand the other side.  It might seem that certain parties care more about the poor than others, but, for the minute, let’s assume that all parties want the same thing, we just differ in how to get there.


    I haven’t yet decided which system is best equipped to provide for the poor, I think most of our judgements come out of present day realities.  Therefor, we see one system not working, and so we attack the system, but economic and political systems are created by man, and therefore subject to subjective interpretations.


    I’m curious to learn about those societies that live in harmony, without any prescribed system of economics and politics.  Take the Native Americans.  It is their culture that ensures that all are taken care of.  The problem with America is the culture that has developed.  And, while most posts on my site and others point out the ills of our culture, we must also consider that America has done some incredibly humanitarian things.  We have people doing the Peace Corps, we’ve established all sorts of organizations to look out for human rights violations around the world. 


    New question, we’ve discussed pleanty of the ills of our capitalistic society, what are some of the benefits?  How can we use the unique strengths of the capitalistic system of cure its ills?

  • Oh…it was only a year ago…my precious South Africa



    The 12 Apostles



    Table Mountain Cable Car



    Best picture i’ve ever taken



    my home, Outward Bound South Africa



    Top of the mountain, top of the world, view of downtown CapeTown and Robben Island on the upper left of the photo



    Always thinking….



    I mean always…Rodan would be proud



    play time



    I’m bored, anyone wanna jump off the highest bungy in the world?



    I taught them those moves



    Please respond…what are your thoughts.  Does he live in poverty?  Is he lucky that he doesn’t have to worry about getting into college and getting a good job?  Is he unfortunate because he’ll never own a digital camera to put his picture on a xanga site?  Is he lucky because he lives in a place more beautiful and pristine than most people ever get to live in?  Is he unfortunate because he doesn’t get Christman presents.  Is he lucky because he can enjoy the simplicity of life?



    Where should Dan go next…I’m thinking Sydney, Sept ’05!!!!!



    Pinky…are you pondering what I’m pondering?


    I think so Brain,,,but where are we gonna find maple syrup at this time of night?


    Cheers all, and to all a good night…off to a Matza Ball, it’s a Jew thing i guess


    -dan

  • Have you ever had a friend who knew everything???  The type of person who has an answer to almost any question.  Well…I’ve been talking to that friend for the last few hours:


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page


    It’s like I’ve discoverd porno and can’t get away from the computer.


    Everything from a run-down of every war known to man, to media bias, to the US’s refusal to comply with the UN after the Iran-Contra scandal, to the origins of Marxism, to so many things.  It has links to everything, so anything that’s new, you can immediately learn.


    For example…I know all about Fox News being a completely biased news program, and I’ve been reflecting a lot on how all news is biased…so I search fox news, that led to a link called, “the propoganda model.” ex)


    TF1 is a French tv station


    “… the job of TF1 is to help Coca-Cola, for example, to sell its product. (…) In order that an advertising message is perceived, the brain of the television viewer must be available. Our broadcasts are aimed at making that brain available: i.e. by distracting it, by relaxing it and preparing it between two messages. What we sell to Coca-Cola is time with this available human brain.”


    Ever think, “man, why do they show so much stupid shit on the news” there you have it.  I spend so much time getting frustrated by how much the news sucks, now I know why.  Not only are they trying to relax your mind and put you in a buying mood for commercial breaks, but, the media gets most of its news from gov’t sources, so it can’t exactly bite the hand that’s feeding it.


    And yes…Noam Chomsky is on my reading list.


  • Thenarrator introduced me to Huey Long, who ran against FDR in 1936.  From discussing socialism, that led me to Stalin, which led me to FDR, and now Huey Long is on my plate.  Here’s a quote:


    “There is nothing wrong with the United States. We have more food than we can eat. We have more clothes and things out of which to make clothes than we can wear. We have more houses and lands than the whole 120 million can use if they all had good homes. So what is the trouble? Nothing except that a handful of men have everything and the balance of the people have nothing if their debts were paid. There should be every man a king in this land flowing with milk and honey instead of the lords of finance at the top and slaves and peasants at the bottom.”


    Title: Share-our-wealth society is simply to mean that God’s creatures on this lovely American continent have a right to share in the wealth they have created in this country. They have the right to a living, with the conveniences and some of the luxuries of this life, so long as there are too many or enough for all. They have a right to raise their children in a healthy, wholesome atmosphere and to educate them, rather than to face the dread of their under-nourishment and sadness by being denied a real life.


    Motto: “Every man a king” conveys the great plan of God and of the Declaration of Independence, which said: “All men are created equal.” It conveys that no one man is the lord of another, but that from the head to the foot of every man is carried his sovereignty.


    Can you imagine a politician saying that today (besides envoking god’s name)?  Some say the problem with America is we’re capitalist.  Well…if Huey Long had his way, he might have been able to address some of the concerns that anti-capitalists hold regarding the exploitation of the working-class.  What did Long propose?


    1. To limit poverty by providing that every deserving family shall share in the wealth of America for not less than one third of the average wealth, thereby to possess not less than $5,000 free of debt. (no poverty, I support it)


    2. To limit fortunes to such a few million dollars as will allow the balance of the American people to share in the wealth and profits of the land. (salary cap on the rich, I support it)


    3. Old-age pensions of $30 per month to persons over 60 years of age who do not earn as much as $1,000 per year or who possess less than $10,000 in cash or property, thereby to remove from the field of labor in times of unemployment those who have contributed their share to the public service. (Social-security, sounds good)


    4. To limit the hours of work to such an extent as to prevent overproduction and to give the workers of America some share in the recreations, conveniences, and luxuries of life.
    (more free time for leisure, keep it comin’…)


    5. To balance agricultural production with what can be sold and consumed according to the laws of God, which have never failed. (pass)


    6. To care for the veterans of our wars. (that’s the least you could do)


    7. Taxation to run the Government to be supported, first, by reducing big fortunes from the top, thereby to improve the country and provide employment in public works whenever agricultural surplus is such as to render unnecessary, in whole or in part, any particular crop. (yeah, steal from the rich, give to the poor, a political Robin Hood!)


    Sounds radical, right?  Jello Biafra, who played in the band Dead Kennedy’s and also once ran against Ralph Nader for the Green Party nomination, was also a fan of the income salary cap. (Biafra does some amazing spoken word performances now)  With regards to taxation, we never hear politicians discussing tax the rich.  Kerry did, but that wasn’t made clear in his platform.  “We can save social security.  We can spend more for public schools.  We can save those programs that we have created to ensure an education and a financial safety net for those who struggle financially.  And…how will we do this?  Not simply by raising taxes, but by taxing the rich.”  You heard Kerry allude to this, “we’ll tax people like me and President Bush,” but he never went far enough.  “Anyone who has enough money to buy multiple luxury cars, will be taxed higher to help others in this country who cannot afford health care.  I myself, as president, will lead by example.  I will make sacrafices for my country.  I will eat out less, and cook dinner more.  I’ll eat peanut butter and jelly sandwhiches if it means someone else who would have gone hungry can also afford a sandwhich to eat” 


    When there was an oil crisis in the ’70′s, does anybody remember having to fill up gas only on certain days of the week.  My parents told me that’s how it was.  Sometimes, life has to be made just a little bit inconvenient.  Americans spend something like $8billion a year on cosmetics.  Things haven’t changed much since Huey Long ran for president.  Too bad he didn’t win, somebody had to kill him first.


    and here’s a button


    Share the Wealth button


    For more info on Huey Long


    http://www.ssa.gov/history/hlong1.html