Topic: Seven Years in Tibet
I haven’t rented a movie in ages, and I don’t know what caught my eye about this one. I’m so glad I picked it though, for so many reasons. It spoke to me about the outdoors, mountaineering, buddhist philosophy, travel, history and war, personal change and growth, education, and, as the movie ended, I could only hope that my ignorance of anything besides the slogan “free tibet,” would be lessened just a little bit by this movie being based on actual events, and it was, which has led me to scour the internet now for resources on Tibet and the Dalai Lama, and to feel just a bit smarter than I was earlier in the day. Once again, what 4 years of college tuition, 16 years inside a classroom, and a college degree didn’t teach me, a simple 2hr. movie (i can’t believe they charge over $4 now at Blockbuster) did the job.
I don’t know if anyone else has seen this movie, or was touched by it like I was. Here’s a quote from Brad Pitt, who plays an Austrian mountaineer in the movie, when asked by the Dalai Lama why he loves the outdoors and the moutains so much.
“The absolute simplicity. That’s what I love.
You have a purpose. Your mind is clear. And calm. Suddenly, the
light becomes sharper. Sounds are richer. All you feel is the deep, powerful
presence of life.
I’ve only felt that way one other time before.”
What Brad P. is referring to at the end, is that he feels the same way in the presence of the Dalai Lama. I was hoping he’d say when he fell in love with his wife…as I’ve never been in love before, but I like to think that when I do, it will feel the same as what I also experience in the outdoors. Absolute simplicity. A purpose. A clear mind. Calm. Everything in life a little brighter and clearer, the equivalant for others of spending lots of money to buy a plasma tv and fancy sound system, except without the fancy technology.
The Dalai Lama has this insatiable thirst for knowledge, and he’s constantly asking questions and learning so many different things. While I think he received some formal schooling later on, it appears his upbringing would be akin to homeschooling. Unlike our Pres., he grew up with an active interest in the world, and grew to appreciate the fact that no man is free until all men in the world are free (that means both men and women of course). He also brings in a human philosophy of the world, based on Buddhist philosophy but this would not contradict our American value of separation of religion from government, as Buddhism is not based on ”god,” and the Dalai Lama does not promote his philosophy as correct because of blind faith, but rather out of the natural goodness that can be found inside any person.
Reading one of his speaches to the US Senate in 1991, I think that the Dalai Lama is a model politician because his motives are pure…and it likely comes from the Buddhist culture. There’s a scene in the movie “Seven Years in Tibet,” I enjoyed, where Brad Pitt is trying to show off for a woman, but does not succeed. She says something like, “That’s another difference between the Western world and our world. In your culture, the ego is important, always trying to do something for praise. In our culture, we admire the person who retreats from the ego.” Here’s a quote from the Lama’s visit to the capitol:
“We need to think very deeply and hold consultations to come up with some kind of master plan for a better world. Sometimes, perhaps I think it is a little bit idealistic, but I feel our role should be based on the principles of democracy, freedom and liberty. I think the ultimate goal should be a demilitarized world. I feel very strongly about this. This may appear very far and we may face many obstacles. But I believe if we keep our determination and effort, we may find some way to achieve this kind of goal. I usually call this `nirvana’ or the salvation of humanity.
So in this respect, our entire humanity has a responsibility, particularly this nation. Among others, you have economic power, but the most important thing you have is the opportunity to utilize your human creativity. This is something very good. Therefore, I think America has the potential to make this world straight. Certain activities or certain atmospheres are unhealthy and seem to be very crooked. I think in order to make them straight and more honest, with more human feeling, this nation has the real potential and the ability to correct those smaller nations trying to change the world, but the existing pattern may face some immediate consequences which they cannot face. I think this nation is the only superpower. Therefore, I think you have the opportunity or ability to change it.”
Knowing what we know from the recent US election, that a president can get elected on rhetoric alone, who will run for the Democratic ticket (until a 3rd party gets legitimate attention, i think) who can say these things? First of all…this is some damn inspiring language. Lama (I hope he doesn’t mind me calling him that) has more faith in America than most Americans do that we can use our superpower status to create a better world order for all. Second of all, these values and words are more aligned with liberal, rather than conservative, politics. I’m not saying we need to adopt a Tibeten philosophy where worms and all living things should be valued as people are (although it’s a sound belief) but, we should certainly adopt a philosophy where killing actually feels repulsive, and therefor, killing will only be used in self-defense. Maybe Saddam could have been linked to al-Qaeda, maybe he might have had weopons of mass destruction, maybe in a couple of years he might have thought of attacking America, BUT, by keeping a good eye on them, and by keeping whatever pressures on them as necessary to not harm us, it’s likely that we wouldn’t have had to harm Iraq as we are now, killing tens of thousands of Iraqis, both Saddam loyalists and innocent civilians alike.
How can I so openly talk about my ignorance, especially when the world ignorance has such a strong connotation of “being a stupid ass idiot?” Well…first of all, because I just looked up the word ”ignorant,” which means “lacking in knowledge and training,” and therefor I am no longer ignorant of what the word ignorant actually means, and therefor, I can comfortably discuss my ignorance of history, politics, and several other important world issues because I’m simply admitting what I don’t know. (perhaps a euphemism for the word would do us good in helping others to admit their own ignorances and begin to fix the education gaps that exist). Anyways…it bothers me that I am ignorant, but it worries me that an gynormous amount of people are unknowingly ignorant, or apathetic about their ignorance.
I’m reading a book that addresses this pheonomenon called, “Lies My Teacher Told Me.” She writes, “five-sixths of all Americans never take a course in American history beyond high school. What our citizns “learn” in high school forms much of what they know about our past.” She goes on to explain what what they learn in high school is pretty pitiful, and since it never gets addressed, people enter their adult lives ignorant. That’s a huge friggin’ problem…and it just revealed itself almost a month ago on election day. I think another part of the problem, is our Western philosophy of education versus what might be described as a Buddhist/taoist view of education. Since our education is grade, credit, and degree oriented, plus all the other notions of success including honor rolls, deans lists, and other academic awards, Western education does not prepare students to learn, “for the sake of learning,” rather, for some other purpose. I’m sure my good pal Lama would support education that has no beginning or end, or the life-long learner that we say we want, but our system of education works directly against.
Along that same line of thought, I think there’s a huge problem occuring to me now about our Western culture. Since our lives are divided up, elementary school, middle school, up to college and grad school, when we do finally enter that second half of our lives, we enter it as isolated individuals. We are no longer part of a school system with clearly defined values in goals…instead, we’re part of a system that for most of us leaves us following materialistic goals only. There was an ad in today’s NYT that was absolutely shocking to me…the Statue of Liberty w/ a gold watch, and it said, “sure, liberty is important, but not that special unless you’re wearing some fine jewelry.” I don’t think a single ad undermines our real goals, but it just highlighted how far off any spiritual path our country has headed. I realized today, as my own family headed off to the malls at 6am to catch the big sales, and as most of the daily conversation and much of the news today was dedicated to this rush to shop, that, I’m not in a place to criticize, and so, I instead find myself feeling all weird and anti-social around people as they discuss these things, and I’m torn between playing along and wanting to shout out as I eventually did when watching a woman on tv get trampled as a mall opened, “THIS IS FUCKIN’ SICK!” I do worry about isolating myself from those mainstream things in life that are necessary to connect myself to most people (i don’t go to the movies often, i don’t follow sports like i did as a kid, i don’t shop, i don’t watch reality tv, i don’t follow celebrities lives) but, i’m realizing that i find it very easy to connect with non-Americans (i love talking about culture, i follow soccer, the most popular sport in the world, etc). As far as the media affecting how we live our lives, as former green party Presdential candidate Jello Biafra says, “don’t blame the media, become the media,” and I think when people start to get a whiff of common sense media, fun media, inspiring and educational media, such as the Daily Show, people will begin to take off their blinders and start examining their lives and the world around them.